Faced with a series of Federal court rulings upholding challenges to ‘no-fly’ orders, or allowing them to proceed toward trial, the US government agencies responsible for ‘no-fly’ orders have responded by pretending that they don’t understand what the courts have ordered them to do.
Instead of complying with court orders, the responsible agencies are asking for months of additional time.
In one case, the request for delay is to get ‘clarification’ of a straightforward court order – and to prepare and submit a different set of pleadings than the exhibits and summaries of testimony the court had demanded.
In another case, the government has asked the court – which has already found that the defendants’ secret no-fly decision-making process unconstitutionally denied the plaintiffs due process of law – to remand the case to the defendants themselves, and give them six months to devise and subject the plaintiffs to yet another extra-judicial ‘review’ of the no-fly list by the defendants, before the court even considers whether that (yet to be devised) new-and-improved administrative no-fly listing and internal kangaroo-court ‘review’ system would be Constitutional.
This post was published at Papers Please on September 2nd, 2014.