BANG: Not Zika: Brazilian/Argentine doctors say: pesticides

BANG: Not Zika: Brazilian/Argentine doctors say: pesticides
Why would a poisonous, birth-defect-causing chemical cause birth defects? I mean, that’s absurd, right? Ridiculous. Let’s blame the whole thing on a virus that causes nothing.
A poison intentionally added to the water supply in 2014? Who cares? Means nothing.
The manufacturer of the poison is a strategic partner of Monsanto? That couldn’t be a clue. Of course not.
Microcephaly: babies born with smaller heads and brain damage.
As I’ve been telling you all along – look to the pesticides. The fake Zika story is a cover, to protect the pesticide companies, among others.
What do we know so far in this trumped up Zika crisis?
Update: The actual number of microcephaly cases in Brazil, the ‘center of the epidemic,’ is a gross unknown. At least two different groups are reporting different findings. Pick your number: 404 confirmed cases; 4000 cases; 9000 cases.
It turns out that, in the US, estimates of microcephaly cases per year ranges all the way from 800 to 25,000.
In other words, the researchers don’t know what they’re talking about. They’re using different definitions of microcephaly. They’re confused. They’re also omitting highly relevant cases of birth defects which don’t, strictly speaking, fit any definition of microcephaly. This confusion applies to Brazil, the US, anywhere on the planet.

This post was published at Jon Rappoport on Feb 10, 2016.