‘Global warming is a non-problem… I say this to Obama: Excuse me, Mr. President, but you’re wrong. Dead wrong.’ (Dr. Ivar Giaever, Nobel-Prize winner in physics)
‘The computer models just weren’t reliable. In fact, I’m not sure the whole thing isn’t crazy, this climate change.’ (Green Guru James Lovelock, who once predicted imminent destruction of the planet via global warming)
I’ve written a number of articles proving the global warming science is far from ‘settled.’ I’ve also written about the political agenda behind climate change. It is stark:
All nations will be ordered (if treaties are signed) to REDUCE THEIR OVERALL ENERGY PRODUCTION BY A DISASTROUS AMOUNT.
Therefore, the output of carbon dioxide would be cut, and, we are told, ‘the planet could be saved.’
But no replacement of carbon-based fuels with solar, wind, and other popular alternative sources could possibly, given present technology, make up the difference and stave off the catastrophe stemming from a major cut in planetary energy production.
This post was published at Jon Rappoport on August 2, 2017.
Follow on Twitter
Recent Comments