Public Is Losing Fear Over ‘Climate Change,’ Scientist Warns

Oh woe! The voters are catching on.
This week saw the 18th anniversary since the Earth’s temperature last rose – something that Dr Benny Peiser, from the Global Warming Policy Forum, says experts are struggling to understand.
He explains that we are now in the midst of a ‘crisis of credibility’ because the global warming – and accompanied ‘Doomsday’ effects – that we were once warned about has not happened.

This post was published at Tea Party Economist on October 6, 2014.

Ebola – A Marker For The Insanity and Tyranny of Government

Are you worried about Ebola? You probably should be. Even if it turns out to be less of a threat than it now appears, it reveals the risks that ideological government is willing to subject the country to in order to protect its perverse and insane practice of political correctness.
Ebola happens to have ratcheted up fear in the country at the moment. However, other diseases that the country is being exposed to could be just as dangerous. Soon we may be looking for new cures for diseases thought mostly eradicated. For sure, we seem headed to seeking a new cure for the insanity and tyranny of government.
This comment by Subotai Bahadur suffices to put matters into perspective:
Subotai Bahadur
1) Responding to epidemics/pandemics is NOT something that has never come up before. The very fact that we are here, with our pre-Ebola life expectancies, is based on the ability of medical science to respond to disease outbreaks.
2) The standard first response, backed by millennia of successful experience, is isolation of the infected community/individuals with quarantine for those who are suspected and at risk.

This post was published at Economic Noise on OCTOBER 4, 2014.

Climate ‘Deniers’ Must Be Jailed or Killed

What is a ‘Climate Change Denier’? We have frequently noted in these pages that the environmental movement has a number of extremist elements that are anti-civilization in their outlook and have a very mean authoritarian streak. Among other things we have frequently cited the fact that many from the authoritarian Left have drifted into this (and other) movements after their sugar daddy in Moscow expired with the fall of the Soviet Union. However, this extremism is now increasingly going mainstream. After the earth’s climate has stopped warming for 18 years running (plus one month) in spite of atmospheric CO2 rising by one third over the same period, many apparently think the best course would be to shut up critics by force.
Let us first define the people who are on the receiving end of the derogatory ‘denier’ term (it is derogatory because it reminds of the term ‘holocaust denier’ and it is clear that this is the reason it was picked). None of them ‘deny’ that the climate is changing. It would be a foolish thing to assert, given that the climate has always changed and always will. The scientists who try to debunk climate alarmism are simply not alarmist.
The vast bulk of them concedes that human activity likely has some influence on the planet’s climate, but they believe that there is no certainty about the size of this influence, and whether CO2 (which the alarmists have declared to be the main ‘climate forcing’ agent) really has all that much to do with it. The paleoclimate record clearly suggests that this is not the case, as CO2 increases in the atmosphere have always followed warming periods with a considerable lag and not led them in a single instance. Moreover, the historical climate record – almost regardless of how far back one looks – shows that the earth’s climate has frequently been far warmer than today, long before anyone thought of burning fossil fuels.
In short, the skeptical argument boils down to: we do not know enough to indict human activity. Much of what we observe could simply be natural variation. Therefore, we should think twice before we take actions that threaten to destroy economic growth and ultimately industrial civilization. By now a powerful record of evidence is backing the skeptics up. Alarmists have invented 52 different excuses over just the past half year or so as to why their ‘predictive computer models’ have failed to predict the ‘pause’ – or why, indeed, they have failed to predict anything at all (the latest, and probably funniest excuse yet, is that they ‘could have predicted it if they had a time machine and could go back into the past’).
Again, it is important to remember here: not a single alarmist prediction made since the late 1970s has come true – not one. However, alarmism sells: it sells newspapers, it is loved by the political class, as it justifies ever greater government interference in the economy, and it is therefore the source of a huge gravy train of scientific grants. Many scientists try to be as alarmist as possible for this very reason: it keeps the grant money flowing. When they think no-one’s looking, they admit to each other what a ‘travesty’ it all is (their words, from the ‘Climategate’ e-mails).

This post was published at Acting-Man on October 4, 2014.

What if it is not Ebola but a BioWarfare Weapon?

This afternoon during my daily drives around paradise as part of my profession, I took the occasion to listen to the Sean Hannity Radio Show, something which happens infrequently due to my busy schedule. At the bottom of the first hour a caller named ‘Mike’ who claimed to be a scientist and CEO of a large corporation during which he claimed that the government is in fact lying and that the disease currently causing problems in Dallas, TX and throughout West Africa is not Ebola but in fact the Marburg Virus (listen at this link towards the 24:50 mark). FWIW, the caller was indeed verified by Hannity’s staff so the conversation was quite disturbing not just because of his conclusions, but the other drastic paths his information could lead anyone with a brain into concluding.
Before proceeding to a very dark conclusion, first a brief education about the Marburg Virus aka Marburg Hemorrhagic Fever courtesy of the CDC website:
Marburg hemorrhagic fever (Marburg HF) is a rare but severe hemorrhagic fever which affects both humans and non-human primates. Marburg HF is caused by Marburg virus, a genetically unique zoonotic (or, animal-borne) RNA virus of the filovirus family. The five species of Ebola virus are the only other known members of the filovirus family.
Marburg virus was first recognized in 1967, when outbreaks of hemorrhagic fever occurred simultaneously in laboratories in Marburg and Frankfurt, Germany and in Belgrade, Yugoslavia (now Serbia). Thirty-one people became ill, initially laboratory workers followed by several medical personnel and family members who had cared for them. Seven deaths were reported. The first people infected had been exposed to imported African green monkeys or their tissues while conducting research. One additional case was diagnosed retrospectively.
The reservoir host of Marburg virus is the African fruit bat, Rousettus aegyptiacus. Fruit bats infected with Marburg virus do not to show obvious signs of illness. Primates (including humans) can become infected with Marburg virus, and may develop serious disease with high mortality. Further study is needed to determine if other species may also host the virus.

This post was published at John Galt Fla on October 2, 2014.

How To Protect Yourself Against Ebola

This week saw the first confirmed case of Ebola virus within the United States, the latest development in an outbreak that has already claimed over 3,000 lives.
Here are some ways you can protect yourself against this deadly disease:
Boil all bodily fluids before consumption. Regularly examine your DNA under an electron microscope for any indication that Ebola has attached itself to your cell membranes.

This post was published at Zero Hedge on 10/03/2014.

Congress Considers Federal Assistance For Laid-Off Coal Miners

A major coal mining company has announced another round of layoffs as declining demand for coal continues to depress the industry.
Alpha Natural Resources, the world’s third largest supplier of metallurgical coal, said Sept. 26 that it would be shuttering three mines in West Virginia due to ‘sustained weak market conditions and government regulations challenging the Central Appalachian mining industry.’
The closures will put 261 people out of work. The news has a familiar refrain; more than 20,000 coal miners have lost their jobs since 2011.
But coal mining jobs have been disappearing for more than 30 years. As of March 2014, there were around79,000 jobs in coal mining in the United States, 8.3 percent fewer than a year earlier.
Compare that to the solar industry, which employs around 143,000 people, according the Solar Energy Industries Association.
The fortunes of the two energy industries will only diverge further in coming years. Sadly, many political leaders in coal producing states have not planned for a future without coal. Instead of recognizing that the coal industry is facing inexorable decline, politicians in coal states like West Virginia and Kentucky mislead residents of their state into thinking that the situation could turn around if certain Environmental Protection Agency regulations are repealed.

This post was published at Zero Hedge on 10/03/2014.

Ebola: What You Need to do Today

We’re under attack.
We are experiencing the worst Ebola outbreak in world history.
If we miss any breaking news in today’s episode, we apologize. This story is fast-moving and we’re taking it in as we go.
But one thing won’t change: We’ve provided a list of items for you to consider purchasing before a potential outbreak occurs in the United States.
If you wait until an outbreak happens, it could be too late.
More on that in a moment.
** According to one microbiologist from Springfield, Missouri, the CDC is lying about the dangers of the infection.
Dr. Gil Mobley wore a protective suit yesterday at Atlanta International to protest how the CDC is handling Ebola.
‘With 10,000 people flying out of West Africa daily, it’s only a matter of time until all corners of the world are exposed,’ he told reporters. ‘Once it devours third world countries, the U. S. will be importing these cases daily. Eventually, the clusters will overwhelm even the most advanced countries’ ability to isolate and quarantine all those exposed.’
‘The CDC is asleep at the wheel,’ Mobley said. ‘It’s going to be bad, and I want to make sure that this conversation is happening that this could get out of control in the United States.’
** Unlike Mobley, we don’t think you should freak out (yet)…
Instead you should get to know the dangers, cut through the clutter (and fearmongering), and make smart choices if you’re in an area where the infection may be spreading (listen up, Texas!).

This post was published at Laissez Faire on OCT 3, 2014.

Obama’s Fascist Healthcare Policies Are Endangering American Lives

The Ebola crisis has taken a decidedly bad turn yesterday as the true agenda of the government and its minions is being fully exposed. In the face of a deadly Ebola crisis that has the potential to sweep accross the country with the vengeance of the 1918 Spanish Flu, one would think that the government watchdogs, the FDA, the CDC and the NIH would welcome help from the non-governmental affiliated healthcare industry in any way that they could get that help. Unfortunately, for the American public, these private corporations who operate with a government charter, are intimidating all but the aforementioned healthcare organizations to forsake any and all health claims as the FDA has completely banned the use of the word ‘Ebola’.
The FDA has sent out letters to nearly every natural healthcare company threatening them with strong action if they do not completely comply with the FDA even when the law does not require such compliance.
The Institute of BioAcoustic Biology A case in point in which the government sponsored healthcare watchdog industries should be welcoming any kind of health advances in the treatment of Ebola, particularly since we seem so helpless in the face of the virus, the work of the Institute of BioAcoustic Biology stands out.
The World Health Organization stated, on August 12, 2014, announced that ‘…the panel reached consensus that it IS ETHICAL TO OFFER UNPROVEN INTERVENTIONS (emphasis added)… There was unanimous agreement that there is a moral duty to also evaluate these interventions’. The Institute of BioAcoustic Biology, located in Albany, Ohio took up the challenge issued by the World Health Organization as they subsequently created software to confirm Ebola activators, genes and proteins which could be used as a means of predicting who would manifest symptoms prior to the manifestation of Ebola symptoms. The technology is based upon an analysis of sound frequencies.

This post was published at The Common Sense Show on October 3, 2014.

Bombing Islamic State Not Enough, Financial War Increasing Economy Falling, CDC Ebola Lies

The following video was published by Greg Hunter on Oct 2, 2014
Speaker of the House John Boehner lays out a case that ‘Airstrikes Not Enough’ to defeat ISIS. Boehner said, ‘At some point, somebody’s boots have to be on the ground.’ ISIS has half of Bagdad surrounded, and I predict the U. S. will send ground troops sooner than later. The coalition is building with countries such as the UK, Belgium and France, but they will not bomb in Syria – only Iraq. I suspect they are afraid of making Russia angry.
The financial war has been going on for a while and it is not abating. Notice those cheap oil prices? There is speculation that oil could hit $60 a barrel! Sure, part of that is declining demand, but part of it is Saudi Arabia who continues to pump oil instead of cutting back production. Why? Saudi Arabia wants to lower oil prices to hurt Russia, and it’s willing to cut prices and take a hit to do it.
A Missouri doctor says the CDC is ‘lying’ or is ‘grossly incompetent’ about the Ebola threat. Dr. Gill Mobley, who is a micro biologist and trauma doctor, boarded a plane in Atlanta with a full hazmat suit on, complete with goggles, gloves and mask. He had written on his hazmat suit ‘CDC is lying.’ He did this as a protest of the handling of the Ebola threat.

Keynesian Ideologue Joseph Stiglitz Opines on ‘Austerity’

The Many Errors of His Ways … An editorial by well-known leftist economist Joseph Stiglitz has recently been published in the Guardian, entitled’Austerity has been an utter disaster for the euro zone’.
Before we are taking a closer look at it, we want to stress that we also believe that the EU’s approach to economic policy is worth criticizing in many respects. Just because we believe that Mr. Stiglitz is essentially an economic crank doesn’t mean that we disagree with every criticism of the so-called ‘austerity’ policy as pursued by the EU. Below are several excerpts from his article with our comments interspersed.
‘If the facts don’t fit the theory, change the theory,’ goes the old adage. But too often it is easier to keep the theory and change the facts – or so German chancellor Angela Merkel and other pro-austerity European leaders appear to believe. Though facts keep staring them in the face, they continue to deny reality.’
The ‘old adage’ is actually a well-known bonmot by J. M. Keynes – curiously, Stiglitz doesn’t mention that. Although it has merit with respect to the natural sciences, it does not apply to economic theory, which is a science of human action and not a study of inanimate objects without volition. Theorems of economics cannot be proved or disproved with ‘empirical data’. We do e.g. not need empirical data to prove the truth of the theorem of marginal utility, or to create a price or value theory, or to prove the truth of the law of association, etc., etc..
All of these economic laws have been discovered by inner reflection and the process of logical deduction. They are only ‘empirical’ in a Thomist or Aristotelian sense (for a detailed explanation of this point of view, we refer readers to Rothbard’s monograph In Defense of Extreme Apriorism -pdf).
To put it differently: one can use economic theory to explain the facts of economic history, but one cannot use economic history to argue for or against points of economic theory. If we look at economic statistics, we see that every slice of history is slightly different, as the contingent data, which are always extremely complex and varied, are different in every case. And yet, the same economic laws have time and place-invariantly operated in every instance and will continue to do so for all eternity, or at least as long as there are human beings who can act with purpose. Stiglitz continues:

This post was published at Acting-Man on October 2, 2014.

Doctor Boards Atlanta Flight In HazMat Suit To Protest “Lying CDC”

“If they’re not lying, they are grossly incompetent,” said Dr. Gil Mobley, a microbiologist and emergency trauma physician from Springfield, Mo. as he checked in and cleared Atlanta airport security wearing a mask, goggles, gloves, boots and a hooded white jumpsuit emblazoned on the back with the words, “CDC is lying!” As The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reports, Mobley says the CDC is “sugar-coating” the risk of the virus spreading in the United States.

This post was published at Zero Hedge on 10/02/2014.

Former Czech President Blasts “The West’s Lies About Russia Are Monstrous”

Vclav Klaus has made a habit of saying things others shy away from saying, but it doesn’t seem to have done him much harm in the popularity stakes. Quite the opposite: the 73-year-old ardently Eurosceptic free-marketeer has legitimate claims to be regarded as the most successful ‘true blue’ conservative politician in Europe over the past 25 years. He was, after all, prime minister of the Czech Republic from 1992 to 1998 and then his country’s president for a further ten years, from 2003 to 2013.
So when we meet after a typically hearty Serbian lunch – at the International Science and Public Conference in Belgrade – I am keen to ask if he has any advice for David Cameron and the British Conservative party.
‘I was invited to a conference last year in Windsor which was called the Conservative Renewal Conference,’ he says. ‘I made a speech in which I asked the question: ‘Do you really need a renewal – or don’t you think it would be sufficient to have a return?’ My speech stressed the need to return to standard conservative ideas and approaches. I am afraid the current leadership of the Conservative party are not exactly doing that.’
Klaus’s message clearly resonates more with activists than with the serial ‘modernisers’ at the top of the party. ‘After I had finished my speech, two or three older ladies came up to me and said, ‘It was like Maggie’s speech!’ So I find the Conservative party now rather confused in its ideas. The party is playing with the green ideas in a way I can’t accept.’
Klaus is not too keen – to say the least – about another element of the ‘modernising’ agenda. ‘The same-sex marriages and all that stuff about family, to put it broadly, is for me another tragic misunderstanding by the current leaders of the party and I am very sorry about that.’

This post was published at Zero Hedge on 10/01/2014.

Study Finds Treated Fracking Wastewater Still Too Toxic

One of the biggest concerns about hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, is that the vast amount of wastewater produced by the process of extracting oil and gas from shale rock deep underground is incredibly toxic.
Most often, the wastewater is injected into disposal wells deep underground. But a process does exist to convert contaminated water into drinking water that involves running it through wastewater treatment plants and into rivers.
Now a new report says that treated wastewater could be fouling drinking water supplies.
In an article published in Environmental Science & Technology — the journal of the American Chemical

This post was published at Zero Hedge on 09/29/2014.

‘Dark zones’ in GMO technology research allow secret development of deadly bioweapons

(NaturalNews) New evidence has emerged to suggest that genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are a key factor in the spread of deadly pathogens like Ebola. The current Ebola outbreak appears to be a direct product of what former Soviet microbiologist Dr. Ken Alibekov calls “dark zones” in GMO technology that allow pathogens to be deliberately weaponized to harm humans. Dating back to the 1970s, the U. S. government has been involved in covert bioweaponry programs that involved deliberately creating “AIDS-like viruses” to be used during warfare, according to a prominent professor of plant pathology. One such virus is Ebola, a manufactured bioweapon patented and owned by the U. S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the vaccine license rights of which are owned by the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The CDC patent for Ebola can be viewed here:Google.com. Dr. Cyril Broderick, formerly of the University of Liberia’s College of Agriculture and Forestry but now teaching at Delaware State University, cites Dr. Leonard Horowitz’s book Emerging Viruses: AIDS and Ebola — Nature, Accident or Intentional? to make the claim that the U. S. government has actually been testing its manufactured bioweapons on Africans for many decades, under the guise of promoting vaccines and “public health.”

This post was published at Natural News on Sunday, September 28, 2014.

Syria, Neo-Cons, And The Attempted Infiltration Of The Liberty Movement

There is nothing worse than a die-hard neoconservative. Of all the socialist horrors wrought against the American public by the Obama administration and its small but impressively insane group of followers, the neoliberals are at least relatively open about their disdain for the Constitution as well as their intentions to reduce our country to a Third World communist enclave. Neoconservatives, on the other hand, have the audacity to pretend as if they adore the Bill of Rights, posing as freedom fighters and champions of liberty while working intently to administer the same exact despotic policies and socialist infrastructure.
As most readers are aware, the false left/right paradigm has been the primary control mechanism used against the American people for decades. The idea being that in order for establishment elites to maintain control of a population with a heritage of independence, a facade of choice must be created to placate the dim-witted masses while the system itself is dominated from behind the scenes. The people of a republic must be conned into participating in the process of their own enslavement, at least until the oligarchs are ready to unleash full-blown totalitarianism. The concept of free elections becomes a grand theatrical display when most candidates, regardless of party affiliation, are bought, bribed, blackmailed or philosophically allied with the elite. The actions of these candidates speak far louder than their rhetoric for those with the sense to pay attention. But for many people, the attachment to the sports team mentality of politics is just too much to resist. For them, the circus is reality.
The birth of neoconservatism is clouded by what some claim to be the ‘incidental’ relationship between neocon adherents like Irving and William Kristol, Abram Shulsky, Paul Wolfowitz, John Ashcroft, Donald Rumsfeld and George W. Bush, among others, and a little-known political science professor by the name of Leo Strauss. Strauss’ work culminated in the University Of Chicago as many of his students and followers went on to engineer the rise of an insidious bureaucratic machine that gave us the Patriot Acts, the fake War on Terror, rationalized torture procedures and numerous other constitutional disgraces.

This post was published at Alt-Market on 25 September 2014.

Obama’s Long Battle to Cut Social Security Benefits

On 12 November 2007, the great blogger ‘Mike the Mad Biologist’ headlined ‘Obama Has Lost My Vote’ and gave as his reason Obama’s having used the phrase ‘the Social Security crisis’ when there was no ‘crisis’ except in the rhetoric of Republican politicians and their aristocratic stooges who want to reduce government benefits for everyone but aristocrats.
President Obama’s plan to cut Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid, predated his becoming President, though he didn’t talk about it when he campaigned for the job. (If he had talked about it, he wouldn’t have won the Democratic nomination; and he might not even have beaten the Republican candidate, John McCain, in 2008, since no Republican Presidential candidate has ever publicly campaigned to weaken what his Party nonetheless routinely contemptuously refers to as ‘entitlements.’) Everyone had simply assumed that no Democrat would want to weaken or reduce the crowning achievements of Democratic Presidents Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Lyndon Baines Johnson, not to mention of the Democratic Party itself. But Barack Obama wanted to do it; and he remains committed to doing it.
On 16 January 2009, four days before Obama became President, Michael D. Shear headlined in theWashington Post, ‘Obama Pledges Entitlement Reform,’ and he reported about ‘a wide-ranging 70 minute interview with Washington Post reporters and editors,’ in which Obama endorsed efforts by congressional Republicans, and ‘the Blue Dog Coalition of fiscally conservative Democrats,’ to cut Social Security and Medicare. Progressives were already disturbed at what their friends in Congress were leaking to them about Obama’s strong commitment to doing this, and so a few blog posts were issued to ring alarm bells publicly about it. Paul Rosenberg at openleft.com headlined on January 17th (three days before Obama’s Inauguration), regarding ‘Obama’s ‘Mandate’ To Slash Medicare, Medicaid & Social Security,’ and he presented polls showing that the public not only didn’t want to cut any of these programs, but that 74% wanted Medicare and Medicare spending increased, and 62% wanted SS spending increased. Even 65% of self-declared ‘conservative’ Americans wanted the medical programs increased, and 62% of them wanted SS spending increased. To Obama, his plan to cut Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid, so as to fund the Wall Street bailout, was an act of political courage. (In his interview with the Washington Post, he ‘pledged to expend political capital on the issue.’) It was his long-term plan, even though the polls showed widespread opposition to it by the public. This was a matter not of expediency, but of conscience, for him: he needed to find some way to fund both theongoing Wall Street bailouts, and the massive federal debt that would be caused by the 2008 Wall Street crash and its resulting plunge in federal tax-collections; and this ‘balanced approach,’ of tax hikes and spending cuts, would be his solution to both problems.

This post was published at Washingtons Blog on September 24, 2014.

Global Climate Hysteria

Leftists on the March The crazies are evidently everywhere. After 18 years of zero global warming, global climate hysterians have decided that we should no longer debate the finer points of all those climate models that have so completely failed to predict any of this. While scientists have by now forwarded altogether 52 different ‘explanations’ (read: guesses, or rather excuses) about where the ‘missing heat has disappeared to’, a great many people seem to have made up their minds already and don’t want to wait for any progress in what appears to be a science that produces an ample amount of papers, but seems to actually not really certain about a great many things just yet.
Instead they are demanding action, and they want it now. What action? That is not 100% clear, but most of the organizations taking part in worldwide demonstrations over the weekend had the term ‘justice’ in their name, asByron York points out in the Washington Examiner. That is usually not a good sign – your wallet and your liberty are likely to suffer in order for others to be able to properly provide all this justice in your name.
Supported by a cast of usual suspects – various deluded Hollywood celebrities, Al Gore (usually the guarantor of cold weather wherever he shows up, in spite of his giant carbon footprint), socialist NY mayor Bill de Blasio, and a platitudes-spouting Ban Ki-Moon (who apparently heads the UN at present), every leftist issue one can think of was apparently promoted. The ‘climate change’ banner, which they say is the defining issue of our times, apparently manages to unite quite a disparate group of would-be planners.
As York writes:
READ MORE

This post was published at Acting-Man on September 24, 2014.

Scientist calls for government permission before humans can ‘breed’

He admits that his suggestion “sounds blatantly authoritarian,” and that it “violates just about every core value we possess in a free society.” But noted transhumanist author Zoltan Istvan believes that a transnational world government body should have the power to forcibly sterilize anyone “deemed unworthy” of parenthood through the use of an implanted microchip. In a guest post for Wired magazine online, Istvan wrote that future technology will change everything about the human experience — including how babies are born:The transhumanist age — where radical science and technology will revolutionise the human being and experience — will eventually bring us indefinite lifespans, cyborgization, cloning, and even ectogenesis, where people use artificial wombs outside of their bodies to raise foetuses. But, as LifeSiteNews‘ Ben Johnson writes, some experts have seen the writing on the wall:Constitutional attorney and civil liberties expert John W. Whitehead, founder of The Rutherford Institute, warned LifeSiteNews earlier this year that political officials would long to use this seminal technology.

This post was published at Natural News on Monday, September 22, 2014.

Rapidly mutating Ebola virus would kill 1.2 million people if it goes airborne, expert predicts

(NaturalNews) There’s a chance that the currently circulating Ebola virus could go rogue and become airborne, and a scientist from Michigan State University warns that more than one million people could die as a result. If Francis Smart’s econometric simulation model is accurate, as many as 1.2 million people could lose their lives from an airborne mutation of the disease, the latest in the ongoing outbreak saga sweeping west Africa. According to Smart, the World Health Organization (WHO) failed to take into account that Ebola could turn airborne when it came up with a prediction of 20,000 infections in six months. The United Nations organization also assumed that massive international aid would arrive in the region back in early August, which never occurred. Today, the rate of disease spread is escalating rapidly, and a number of different predictive models say Ebola has reached exponential growth. It is anyone’s guess, in other words, how many people will become infected, especially if anything should change in terms of how the disease is spreading.

This post was published at Natural News on Monday, September 22, 2014.

Scientific Evidence Proves Ebola Is Airborne and Our Liberian Bound Troops Are Walking Into a Death Trap

On the surface, the Presidential order to send 3,000 military personnel to Ebola-ridden is nothing but sheer lunacy. This 3 day old order have left people scratching their heads and wondering if Obama has lost his mind.
This article will shed light on the fact that Obama is acting with depraved indifference and the evidence is clear, Ebola is much more contagious than the government is telling the people and the available science speaks clearly to this fact.
Doctors Are Condemning the Sending of US Troops to Liberia Dr. Lee Hieb, former president of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons has stated that ‘You can see that these doctors, who are highly trained people, got themselves infected… So sending troops into an area, if they’re dealing one-on-one with a patient, they’re not going to be able to protect themselves very well. It’s not easy to [prevent transmission], because you get tired and you get careless and you make some simple mistakes. All it takes is one virus particle.’
Elaine Donelly, president of the Center for Military Readiness, has stated that, ‘I’m just appalled. Judging from this, the United States seems to have a very confused vision of what ‘national security’ means.’ Donelly went on to state that Obama is putting both our troops and their families at risk.

This post was published at The Common Sense Show on September 20, 2014.