FIRED FOR EXPOSING SANDY HOOK ‘MASSACRE’: PROFESSOR JAMES TRACY DENIED FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS BY FEDERAL COURT

The Death of Academic Freedom
On December 11, 2017, in a serious miscarriage of justice, a jury in West Palm Beach, Florida, ruled unanimously in favor of Florida Atlantic University and against former Media Studies Professor James Tracy, who was suing for reinstatement after his firing in 2016.
The jury found that Tracy’s ‘controversial’ articles on Memory Hole Blog were not a ‘motivating factor’ in his firing, the only question they were required to consider. Of course, Tracy’s posts at ‘his conspiracy theory blog’ were indeed the reason he was fired, but the jury was convinced otherwise by FAU’s legal team with assistance from the judge.
The case centered around Tracy’s writings on the anomalies found in the reporting on the Sandy Hook ‘massacre’ of December 14, 2012. His skepticism about the event was not to the liking of the university.
FAU maintained that Tracy was not fired from his tenured position because of his blog posts, but because he did not follow the ‘rules’ set out by ‘his bosses’ at the government-run institution. FAU attorney G. Joseph Curley insisted that Tracy was not denied his First Amendment rights, but that he simply did not follow university procedure.
‘Professor Tracy doesn’t follow the rules,’ Curley told the jury. ‘They’re rules that everyone else follows. He doesn’t play by the rules.’ FAU cast the case as one of a ‘belligerent,’ rebellious,’ and ‘nonconformist’ employee being let go for ‘insubordination,’ instead of that of a tenured professor exercising his right to free speech.[1]
FAU’s current ‘rules’ require that faculty submit forms listing ‘outside activities’ to be vetted for administrative approval, whether the activities are compensated or not. Tracy and other professors at FAU had argued that the policy is vague and confusing, constituting a form of prior restraint forbidden by the First Amendment, and leading to a climate of ‘fear and uncertainty’ among the faculty.
Aside from the fact that ‘outside activities’ can reach into all aspects of a professor’s life and therefore be difficult if not impossible to list, such activities must not be subject to bureaucratic approval. And certainly, no tenured professor can be fired for not filling out a form, even at Florida Atlantic University.[2]

This post was published at The Daily Sheeple on DECEMBER 27, 2017.

WAS THE ‘LONE WOLF’ LAS VEGAS MASSACRE REALLY A FALSE FLAG TO COVER AN ASSASSINATION ATTEMPT ON SAUDI CROWN PRINCE?

After the events of Sandy Hook, we already know that any mass murder shootings will always be covered up quickly by Federal law enforcement, even to the extent of co-opting and silencing local authorities.
And this was even evident in the more recent Las Vegas massacre where an FBI handler was whispering in the ear of the city’s Sheriff ‘Don’t go there’ when asked a pertinent question by the media.
Video on FBI controlling narrative for Local Sheriff
And with so many other accounts of there being multiple shooters, gates locked so that people couldn’t escape the carnage, and too many other obvious questions such as shootings occurring in other casino’s not within range of ‘Paddock’s’ hotel room window, what remains is a why are so many details about the event being covered up, and even more, was Stephen Paddock really just a scapegoat for an even more sinister event?
What the media failed to every mention was that at the time of the Las Vegas Massacre, the highly controversial Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia, Muhammed Bin Salman, was in a resort at the same time as the shootings took place, and is alleged to have been seen in a video being ushered out to escape what may have been an assassination attempt.

This post was published at The Daily Sheeple on DECEMBER 23, 2017.

He Did It! Nimrod Says There Were No Deaths in the Texas Church

In my previous aricle, “Blue Pill Blue Ribbon. No passenger deaths on 9/11; also, no deaths at Sandy Hook, Orlando, Las Vegas, and New York City”, I reported on his views of mass-murders. There were none. They were all staged.
By whom? He has no opinion. Why? He has no opinion. But they were staged.
But he held back on Texas. I reported: “no opinion yet.” I feared he would wimp out. I had a moment of doubt. Would he let us down? I have great news. This was posted Saturday.
Nimrod posted:TX shootings Sorry for the delay. The LV and NY fake hoax shootings burned me out.
Turns out TX is another fake.
1.) Shooter dead. Dead men don’t talk.
2.) Pastor and family out that week. What are the odds? Call it a miracle.
No more research needed. I’m tired.
be honest here. We don’t see this kind of dedication all that often. We don’t see people who hold to a position that is this off-the-wall crazy on a regular basis. He had a quinfecta going for him: 9/11, Sandy Hook, Orlando, the New York City bridge, and Las Vegas. Most of us have heard of a trifecta. A quadfecta is really obscure. Nimrod began with a quinfecta, except that there isn’t such a thing in horse race betting.

This post was published at Gary North on November 13, 2017.

Democrat Senator: ‘No One Is Safe Until Congress Acts On Gun Violence’

It’s inevitable that those who committed no crime will be punished for the actions of madmen by laws designed to enslave them. After all, that’s how tyranny thrives and Democrats were quick to jump on gun control once again after the Texas church shooting.
Senator Chris Murphy, a Connecticut Democrat who has emerged as a leading advocate for gun control, made an obviously emotional appeal on Sunday for Congress to address ‘gun violence’ in the wake of the deadly church shooting in Sutherland Springs, Texas. Murphy’s lengthy statement pleads and begs Congress to start writing laws that won’t affect criminals or lunatics but will hinder the decent American’s ability to defend themselves.
‘The terrifying fact is that no one is safe so long as Congress chooses to do absolutely nothing in the face of this epidemic,’ Murphy said in the statement, stressing that time to act ‘is now.’ He continued, saying: ‘As my colleagues go to sleep tonight, they need to think about whether the political support of the gun industry is worth the blood that flows endlessly onto the floors of American churches, elementary schools, movie theaters, and city streets.’ The only more emotional appeal ever made was perhaps Barack Obama’s speech after the Sandy Hook massacre.

This post was published at shtfplan on November 6th, 2017.

MORE QUESTIONS THAN ANSWERS: Was Sandy Hook Shooter Known to FBI Prior to School Massacre?

21st Century wire says…
The FBI recently released new documents regarding the bizarre and still forensically critiqued Sandy Hook elementary school shooting tragedy.

KEY POINT: It’s important to remember that even though the events at Sandy Hook were said to have been carried out by that of a deranged lone gunman named Adam Lanza, initial reports on several CBS and ABC affiliates following the Sandy Hook mass shooting stated there was a ‘second shooter’ who was apprehended at the scene.

This post was published at 21st Century Wire on OCTOBER 25, 2017.

BREAKING: FBI RELEASES DOCS ON SANDY HOOK SHOWING FEDS VISITED SHOOTER BEFORE MASSACRE

On December 14, 2012, the world watched the news with horror as they heard the story of 20-year-old Adam Lanza fatally shooting 20 children between six and seven years old, as well as six staff members at Sandy Hook Elementary School. Since that fateful day, conspiracy theories have abounded from whether or not the shooting actually took place to what Lanza’s motive was.
Adam Lanza is believed to have shot his mother, Nancy Lanza, in the head at her home in Newtown, Connecticut, around 9 a.m. on December 14, before taking her car and driving approximately five miles to the Sandy Hook Elementary School, where he would slaughter the children and teachers.
According to reports, most of the shooting occurred in two of the school’s first-grade classrooms; 14 students in one classroom, and six in the other, were murdered. Only two of the victims who were shot by Lanza – both teachers – survived the attack.
Now, the documents which could lay to rest many of these conspiracy theories have been released by the FBI. At 10:00 AM EST, on Tuesday, the FBI, without any notice, took to Twitter to post the link to over 1,500 pages of documents from their investigation and subsequent findings.

This post was published at The Daily Sheeple on OCTOBER 24, 2017.

Multiple shooters in Vegas: the standard progression in staged attacks

– In case anyone doesn’t get the point, multiple shooters in Las Vegas would imply much planning and coordination for a given political purpose. Not a crazy lone act of a crazy man. The whole scene would change in an instant. Everything the public knows would be wrong.
In a minute, I’ll get to an expert report about the now-famous taxi cab video, which contains much audio of shots fired at the Mandalay Hotel. The driver was parked at the hotel when the shooting began and stayed there for several minutes. But first, I want to describe the standard progression in false flags.
In several articles (archive here), I’ve established enough probability of multiple shooters, in the Vegas-concert attack, to warrant a serious and honest investigation by law-enforcement.
But of course, that’s not happening.
There is a standard sequence that is usually followed in these events.
As soon as the attacks occur, reports begin coming in from the press. There is conflicting information. There were multiple shooters – no, there was just one shooter. The purported Sandy Hook shooter, Adam Lanza? His father was killed in New Jersey – no, his mother was killed in Connecticut.
These discrepancies and bizarre contradictions are pruned away and discarded by the press as quickly as possible, as the official line is brought front and center. The contradictions are buried as if they never existed.

This post was published at Jon Rappoport on October 4, 2017.

Pat Buchanan Reflects On “A Brief Moment Of Unity In A Disintegrating World”

‘An act of pure evil,’ said President Trump of the atrocity in Las Vegas, invoking our ancient faith: ‘Scripture teaches us the Lord is close to the brokenhearted and saves those who are crushed in spirit.’
‘Our unity cannot be shattered by evil. Our bonds cannot be broken by violence,’ Trump went on in his most presidential moment, ‘and though we feel such great anger at the senseless murder of our fellow citizens, it is love that defines us today and always will. Forever.’
Uplifting words. But are they true?
Or will this massacre be like the Sandy Hook Elementary School slaughter of 20 children in Newtown, Connecticut, or Charleston massacre of black churchgoers by Dylan Roof – uniting us briefly in ‘sadness, shock and grief’ only to divide us again and, more deeply, in our endless war over guns.
‘In memory of the fallen, I have directed that our great flag be flown at half-staff,’ said the president. As he spoke, the mind went back to yesterday afternoon where the NFL was roiled anew by athletes earning seven-figure salaries ‘taking a knee’ in disrespect of that flag.
Also on Sunday, cable TV was given over to charges that Trump, attending a golf tournament in New Jersey, cared nothing about the suffering of ‘people of color’ in Puerto Rico.

This post was published at Zero Hedge on Oct 3, 2017.

Trump Talks Gun Control, And What We Will More Than Likely See From The Government

President Donald Trump was still appearing a little dismissive earlier today when he discussed the possibility of addressing gun laws in the future following the massacre in Las Vegas. Although his supporters were quick to say it was a ‘write off’ and he would never enact gun control, Trump’s history before his campaign shows him to be not quite as friendly to gun owners as some may hope.
Trump merely said he will be ‘talking about gun control as time goes by,’ but that’s hardly comforting to gun owners who know his history on the second amendment, and it isn’t all flags and patriotism as would believe. More likely than not, some gun control laws will be written at the state level in places that are massive democrat strongholds, like California, New Jersey, or New York. But the possibility of more federal laws now looms over our heads too.
Back in 2000, Trump laid out his views on gun control. In a page-long explanation of his stance on guns in his book The America We Deserve, Trump assessed the differences between the two main political parties’ gun policies. He called what he said was the Democratic party’s desire to ‘confiscate’ guns ‘a dumb idea’ and said Republicans ‘refuse even limited restrictions,’ noting that they ‘walk the NRA line.’ Instead, he cast his stance as something of a middle ground. ‘I generally oppose gun control, but I support the ban on assault weapons and I also support a slightly longer waiting period to purchase a gun,’ he wrote. And if that isn’t evidenced enough, Trump also agreed with Barack Obama, one of the most anti-gun presidents in modern history, after the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary school in Newtown, Connecticut.

This post was published at shtfplan on October 3rd, 2017.

Parents Of Mass Shooting Victim Sued Ammo Dealer – Now They Face Bankruptcy

2012 was a devastating year for gun rights in America. Together, the Aurora shooting and the Sandy Hook shooting galvanized the gun control movement, leading to the passing of a slew of unconstitutional firearm laws across the country. Amid the Left’s panic over privately owned ‘assault’ weapons that were used in these incidents, was the tragic case of Lonnie and Sandy Phillips. They were the parents of a woman who was killed by James Holmes. They responded by suing the popular ammunition supplier known as Lucky Gunner, because the company had sold Holmes ammunition that was used in the attack.
From the beginning, it was obvious that their lawsuit would go nowhere. There was no legal basis for it, because Lucky Gunner had done nothing illegal. In fact, the 2005 Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act was put in place specifically to protect gun companies like Lucky Gunner from frivolous lawsuits like this. Simply put, gun companies can’t be held liable for the criminal actions of their customers, no more than a cutlery company can be sued by the victims of knife attacks.
So it’s no surprise that their case was recently thrown out by the courts. But not only was it thrown out, the couple has been ordered to pay Lucky Gunner’s $200,000 legal fees.

This post was published at shtfplan on August 7th, 2017.

In Major Win For Beijing Panama Establishes Ties With China, Cuts Relations With Taiwan

While Megyn Kelly’s interview with Russian President (and all around global bad guy if one were to believe the daily barrage of leftist headlines) Vladimir Putin did not raise the ire of advertisers, it appears her interview with right-wing provocateur Alex Jones has lurched from social media firestorm to real-world dollars and cents for NBC News.
The sit-down has been promoted as a discussion about ‘controversies and conspiracies.’
In a video promoting the interview, Jones talks about the 9/11 attacks as an ‘inside job.’ In the clip, Kelly also brings up Sandy Hook, saying: ‘When you say parents faked their children’s deaths, people get very angry.’ Jones replies: ‘But they don’t get angry about half-a-million dead Iraqis from the sanctions.’
Next Sunday, I sit down with conservative radio host @RealAlexJones to discuss controversies and conspiracies #SundayNight June 18 on NBC pic.twitter.com/7bVz6Fobf5
— Megyn Kelly (@megynkelly) June 11, 2017

This post was published at Zero Hedge on Jun 13, 2017.

JPMorgan Pulls Ads From NBC News After Megyn Kelly’s “Repulsive” Alex Jones Interview

While Megyn Kelly’s interview with Russian President (and all around global bad guy if one were to believe the daily barrage of leftist headlines) Vladimir Putin did not raise the ire of advertisers, it appears her interview with right-wing provocateur Alex Jones has lurched from social media firestorm to real-world dollars and cents for NBC News.
The sit-down has been promoted as a discussion about ‘controversies and conspiracies.’
In a video promoting the interview, Jones talks about the 9/11 attacks as an ‘inside job.’ In the clip, Kelly also brings up Sandy Hook, saying: ‘When you say parents faked their children’s deaths, people get very angry.’ Jones replies: ‘But they don’t get angry about half-a-million dead Iraqis from the sanctions.’
Next Sunday, I sit down with conservative radio host @RealAlexJones to discuss controversies and conspiracies #SundayNight June 18 on NBC pic.twitter.com/7bVz6Fobf5
— Megyn Kelly (@megynkelly) June 11, 2017

This post was published at Zero Hedge on Jun 12, 2017.

Fake news: actors, robots, androids, television creations

– Notes on media invention –
– Notes on interviewees who try to appear normal on television and who are bizarre to the nth degree. These interviewees are so bizarre, in part, because they ARE trying to appear normal –
I wrote this Sandy Hook article in 2013. It’s about the soap opera called television. I’ve added some new comments:
Online investigations of what really happened at Sandy Hook easily number in the thousands by now. Among other reporters, I have listed and described many contradictions and lies in the official scenario, and I’ve offered alternative explanations.
People have concluded:
No one was really killed in Sandy Hook, it was all faked;
The killings were real, but Adam Lanza wasn’t the shooter, he was the patsy;
Lanza was the killer, compelled by psychiatric drugs.
A Satanic group was behind the killings;
Players in the federal government secretly contracted the killings in order to take guns away…
No matter what the conclusion, many of the investigations and analyses have turned up startling and useful information.
On YouTube, clips of Sandy Hook citizens being interviewed reveal astonishing reactions and non-reactions that are light years away from what you would expect to see in the immediate wake of such a tragedy.

This post was published at Jon Rappoport on February 5, 2017.

Federal Government False Flag Actors

Main stream media stalwart publisher, The Washington Post, claims those sites that anyone who disagrees with or challenges the elite’s narrative is part of a massive Russian propaganda consortium, despite a total absence of any evidence. The worst offender of all forms of propaganda is the elite’s corporation, aka the federal government.
False flags are the federal government’s go-to schemes for defrauding the public in every way imaginable. Here are but a few. Not covered here are the myriad deaths of those who get in the way of the elite’s narrative, including journalists.
False Flag Crisis Actors
This page simply shows the crisis actors who have been used in several False Flag event, which proves that the events are controlled by the evil ones.
Here is the same crisis actor who was supposedly a former classmate of the alleged Sandy Hook shooter Adam Lanza; who now is the sister of James Foley who was supposedly beheaded on the fake video.

This post was published at Edge Trader Plus on Wednesday 30 November 2016.

CRAZED COP SHOOTER, 2 ‘EXPLOSIONS’ – HAS ENGINEERED END OF AMERICA BEGUN?

With about six weeks remaining before the highly volatile US presidential election it appears the ruling elite could be officially going for it all. That is, in terms of destroying America.
With ISIS stories apparently on the side burner, and with too much attention focused on the Hillary saga, and with George Soros (like the DNC and the Clinton Foundation before him) now exposed for not only funding the Black Lives Matter civil unrest psyop to the tune of 33 million dollarsbut also for his agenda to federalize the local police in America, all of a sudden in one day the mainstream media is reporting on not one, not two but three chaotic stories which, given the strong history of staged events we’ve seen over the past few years, could all be psyop events to move the ruling elites plan to create chaos and unrest in America going forward.
The first of these three events (at the time of this article or 16 hours after the incident) takes place in Philadelphia where a lunatic ‘unidentified’ shooter is said to have suddenly and for no particular reason run up to a police car and just started shooting randomly at police officer Sgt Silvia Young. Sgt Young (get this) gets shot up all over, a total of 8 times and still survives and is in stable condition. Former police officer Ed Miller also supposedly gets shot but there is no specific information about this other than we’re told he, too, is in stable condition.
Before we get into the other two bizarre and very suspicious stories of the day, all truth seekers should pay attention to this first very important point. Aside from the fact that all the details regarding this shooting are blurry and lack motive and some of the details given are sketchy at best, please take notice of who is issuing out, or should I say who is CONTROLLING the information (think Lt Paul Vance Sandy Hook psyop), it’s this often cited Philadelphia Police Commissioner Richard Ross. So instead of immediately calling this a false flag staged event (like so many events today) just notice for yourself who seems to be assigned to laying down the narrative. This is a huge thing for truth seekers to pick up on (think now soon to be former Police Chief David Brown):

This post was published at The Daily Sheeple on SEPTEMBER 19, 2016.

Mind control achieved through the ‘information flicker effect’

I wrote this piece in 2012, in the wake of the Sandy Hook shooting. I re-post it now, because it equally applies to the Orlando shooting.
No, I’m not talking about the flicker of the television picture. I’m talking about an on-off switch that controls information conveyed to the television audience.
The Sandy Hook school murders provide an example.
First of all, elite media coverage of this tragedy has one goal: to provide an expanding narrative of what happened. It’s a story. It has a plot.
In order to tell the story, there has to be a source of information. The topflight television anchors are getting their information from…where?
Their junior reporters? Not really. Ultimately, the information is coming from the police, and secondarily from local officials.
In other words, very little actual journalism is happening. The media anchors are absorbing, arranging, and broadcasting details given to them by the police investigators.
The anchors are PR people for the cops.
This has nothing to do with journalism. Nothing.

This post was published at Jon Rappoport on June 20, 2016.