Zika hoax: strategy of liars, house of cards

The entire platform of ‘proof’ that the Zika virus causes a birth defect called microcephaly has descended into gibberish.
I’m not going to recapitulate all my Zika-hoax articles here. Suffice to say, researchers have only established a very weak correlation between the presence of Zika and the occurrence of microcephaly.
This weak correlation is actually evidence that Zika has nothing to do with microcephaly.
But now, we’re in the ‘expansion’ phase. Medical bureaucrats at the CDC and the World Health Organization (WHO), knowing they’re standing on quicksand, knowing they’re nothing more than professional liars, are executing a familiar cover story.
They’re claiming that Zika causes a number of other conditions in babies. They’re ranging all over the map. Zika can cause smaller heads in babies with no brain damage, or brain damage without smaller heads? Or paralysis? Or who knows what else…
Later addiction to ice cream? The desire to play outdoors? Interest in cowboys and Indians? Love of Law&Order reruns?
By smearing the possible conditions Zika can cause from the North Pole to the tip of Argentina – with nothing more than very weak correlations in each instance – the plan is to give the impression that Zika is creating a great deal of damage.
But as I’ve pointed out, weak correlation A plus weak correlation B plus weak correlations C, D, E, and F equal overall Weak Correlation, not actual evidence of a causal connection.
Smoke and mirrors equals smoke and mirrors.

This post was published at Jon Rappoport on July 1, 2016.